Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Decision-making, Gender and Field of Academic Major Choice

Show simple item record

dc.contributor George B. Vaughan, Committee Chair
dc.contributor Barbara J. Risman, Committee Member
dc.contributor Carol E. Kasworm, Committee Member
dc.contributor Marilee J. Bresciani, Committee Co-Chair
dc.creator Hambourger, Lynda Horhota
dc.date 2010-04-02T19:16:51Z
dc.date 2010-04-02T19:16:51Z
dc.date 2004-06-07
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-28T17:07:01Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-28T17:07:01Z
dc.identifier etd-06012004-135724
dc.identifier http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5628
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/265483
dc.description The purpose of this study was to explore the elationship of career decision-making to academic major choice in undeclared, full-time, first-year undergraduate students. The study used career decision-making survey data gathered by the Career Decision Profile (Jones, 1989), as well as major decidedness, bio-demographic, and academic ability data. Bivariate correlations of decision-making variables and gender showed that gender was not significantly related to decision-making, with two exceptions: Men were significantly more decisive than women and women were significantly more career-salient than men. A multiple linear regression predicting major decidedness found career decidedness to be the strongest predictor of major decidedness. Other decision-making variables, SATV, and college GPA were also significant predictors. Differences depending on GPA level were found; differences depending on gender were not found. The equation predicting major decidedness left approximately 60% of the variance in major decidedness unaccounted for. Two descriptive discriminant analyses, one for women and one for men, examined the behavior of students who had chosen a major by the end of the first semester sophomore year. These students were placed into one of six curriculum groups (applied sciences, business, engineering/physical sciences, humanities, life sciences, and social sciences), which comprised the independent variable of the descriptive discriminant analyses; decisionmaking and academic ability variables were the criterion variables in the analyses. For both men and women, differences among curriculum groups were most strongly characterized by differences in academic ability variables, while decision-making variables played significant but weaker roles. The curriculum group most clearly distinguished by the descriptive discriminant analyses for both genders was engineering/physical sciences; the group least clearly distinguished for both genders was business. Greater clarity was found for men than for women. The descriptive discriminant analyses revealed academic major choice to be a complex process involving academic ability, decision-making characteristics, and gender in different ways among students in different curriculum groups. The study's results challenge the assumption of rationalistic models of academic advising that choice of major is based primarily on career decision-making.
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
dc.subject major choice
dc.subject academic advising
dc.subject career decision-making
dc.subject academic major
dc.subject gender and academic major
dc.subject Career Decision Profile
dc.title Decision-making, Gender and Field of Academic Major Choice


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 397.4Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse