Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill

Show simple item record

dc.creator World Bank
dc.date 2012-03-19T10:24:52Z
dc.date 2012-03-19T10:24:52Z
dc.date 2010-10-12
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-17T20:44:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-17T20:44:05Z
dc.identifier http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101104023105
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2923
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243278
dc.description Serbia's public sector wage bill constitutes a significant share of total government expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This is largely due to higher average levels of compensation, rather than higher levels of staffing. While wage spending has fallen recently this is not the occasion to be sanguine about the Government's wage and employment policies. There are two reasons. First, continuing control over the wage bill is a key part of the Government's overall deficit reduction strategy. Given the Government's reluctance to raise taxes and the difficulty it confronts in reducing other major categories of expenditures (particularly pensions), restraining the wage bill is critical to fiscal sustainability. In connection with its standby arrangement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the government is committed to enacting fiscal responsibility legislation which would cap wage bill spending at eight percent of gross domestic product (GDP) over the medium term. To date, the Government has been relying on blunt instruments to achieve this target; most importantly a freeze on nominal wages and a partial freeze on the creation of new positions, both introduced in 2009. As the current recession eases, pressures to increase wages are mounting. The wage freeze is becoming politically unsustainable. More nuanced methods of restraining the wage bill are required. Second, over the longer term, the present policy of continuous wage and position freezes would undermine the quality of public administration. Persistent wage freezes would make it difficult to attract and retain competent staff. Persistent position freezes would lock in existing patterns of over- and under staffing. On the other hand, a reversion to the former system of ad hoc adjustments in staffing and wages could set the stage for unsustainable wage bill growth in the future. Structural reforms are therefore required.
dc.language English
dc.publisher World Bank
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.rights World Bank
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject ACCOUNTING
dc.subject ADVERSE SELECTION
dc.subject ATTRITION
dc.subject AVERAGE WAGE
dc.subject AVERAGE WAGES
dc.subject BUDGET EXECUTION
dc.subject BUDGET PROCESS
dc.subject CIVIL SERVANT
dc.subject CIVIL SERVANTS
dc.subject CLERKS
dc.subject COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
dc.subject COMPETITIVE PRESSURES
dc.subject CRIME
dc.subject DISMISSAL
dc.subject EARNING
dc.subject ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
dc.subject EMPLOYEE
dc.subject EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS
dc.subject EMPLOYMENT POLICIES
dc.subject EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
dc.subject EQUAL PAY
dc.subject EQUALIZATION
dc.subject FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
dc.subject FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
dc.subject GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
dc.subject GOVERNMENT SPENDING
dc.subject GROSS WAGES
dc.subject HEALTH INSURANCE
dc.subject HOUSING
dc.subject HUMAN RESOURCE
dc.subject HUMAN RESOURCES
dc.subject INCOME
dc.subject INCOME TAXES
dc.subject INFLATION
dc.subject INFORMAL SECTOR
dc.subject INSURANCE
dc.subject JOB SECURITY
dc.subject JOBS
dc.subject JUDICIARY
dc.subject LABOR FORCE
dc.subject LABOR LAW
dc.subject LABOR MARKET
dc.subject LABOR RELATIONS
dc.subject LAWS
dc.subject LAWYERS
dc.subject LOCAL BUDGETS
dc.subject LOCAL FINANCE
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
dc.subject LOCAL LEVEL
dc.subject MINIMUM WAGE
dc.subject MINISTER
dc.subject MINISTRIES OF FINANCE
dc.subject MUNICIPAL COUNCILS
dc.subject MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS
dc.subject MUNICIPALITIES
dc.subject MUNICIPALITY
dc.subject NOMINAL WAGES
dc.subject OCCUPATION
dc.subject OCCUPATIONS
dc.subject OUTPUTS
dc.subject PAYROLL TAX
dc.subject POLICE
dc.subject POLITICIANS
dc.subject POVERTY REDUCTION
dc.subject PRIMARY LEVEL
dc.subject PRIMARY SCHOOL
dc.subject PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT
dc.subject PRIVATE FIRMS
dc.subject PRIVATE SECTOR
dc.subject PRIVATE SECTOR WAGES
dc.subject PRIVATE SECTORS
dc.subject PRIVATIZATION
dc.subject PRODUCTIVITY
dc.subject PROVISIONS
dc.subject PUBLIC
dc.subject PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
dc.subject PUBLIC EDUCATION
dc.subject PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
dc.subject PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
dc.subject PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
dc.subject PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
dc.subject PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR COMPENSATION
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR DOWNSIZING
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR STAFF
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE BILL
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR WORKER
dc.subject PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS
dc.subject PUBLIC SERVICE
dc.subject PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES
dc.subject PUBLIC SERVICES
dc.subject PUBLIC SPENDING
dc.subject REAL WAGE
dc.subject REAL WAGES
dc.subject RETIREMENT
dc.subject SAVINGS
dc.subject SELF EMPLOYMENT
dc.subject SERVANTS
dc.subject SERVICE SECTOR
dc.subject SEVERANCE PAYMENT
dc.subject SEVERANCE PAYMENTS
dc.subject STRUCTURAL REFORMS
dc.subject TAX
dc.subject TEMPORARY WORKERS
dc.subject TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
dc.subject TOTAL WAGE
dc.subject TRADE UNIONS
dc.subject TRANSPARENCY
dc.subject TREASURY
dc.subject UNEMPLOYED
dc.subject URBAN AREAS
dc.subject VOTERS
dc.subject WAGE ADJUSTMENT
dc.subject WAGE BILL
dc.subject WAGE DATA
dc.subject WAGE DETERMINATION
dc.subject WAGE INCREASES
dc.subject WAGE LEVELS
dc.subject WAGE NEGOTIATION
dc.subject WAGE PREMIUM
dc.subject WAGE STRUCTURE
dc.subject WORK FORCE
dc.subject WORKERS
dc.title Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill
dc.type Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review
dc.coverage Europe and Central Asia
dc.coverage Europe
dc.coverage Serbia


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
540560ESW01gra11121201010BOX353774B.pdf 258.2Kb application/pdf View/Open
540560ESW01gra11121201010BOX353774B.txt 155.4Kb text/plain View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse